Best software · Developer & data
10 Best CI/CD Tools of 2026
This list is for engineering teams that want every commit built, tested and deployed without manual steps. It covers CI/CD built into code hosts (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CD, Bitbucket Pipelines, Azure Pipelines), dedicated cloud CI services (CircleCI, Buildkite, Travis CI), self-hosted servers (Jenkins, TeamCity) and a delivery platform aimed at larger organizations (Harness). We compared documented features and published prices for 10 tools. Scores weigh features at 40%, ease of use at 30% and value at 30%.
By the Mojolin research desk · Updated November 9, 2026 · 10 tools compared · Prices checked on vendor pages, latest November 9, 2026
Questions or corrections: editorial@mojolin.com
Mojolin is self-funded How we score
GitHub Actions is our top pick for most engineering teams: workflows live next to the code, every GitHub plan includes CI/CD minutes (2,000 a month on Free and 3,000 on Team at $4 per user per month), and the Actions marketplace covers most build, test and deploy steps. GitLab CI/CD is the strongest single-platform choice, with pipelines, security testing and project management in one product and 10,000 compute minutes a month on Premium. CircleCI is the best dedicated cloud CI service, with up to 6,000 free build minutes and a usage-based Performance plan from $15 per month. Teams that run their own build fleet should look at Buildkite or Jenkins, and Microsoft shops should look at Azure Pipelines.
Top picks
Best overall
GitHub Actions
9.3 / 10
Teams that host code on GitHub and want builds, tests and deploys next to their pull requests.
Read the review →Runner-up
GitLab CI/CD
8.8 / 10
Teams that want source control, pipelines and security testing in one platform, including on their own servers.
Read the review →Also great
CircleCI
8.7 / 10
Teams that want a dedicated, fast cloud CI service that works with GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket.
Read the review →Comparison table
| # | Tool | Pricing | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GitHub Actions | Teams that host code on GitHub and want builds, tests and deploys next to their pull requests. | Free plan with 2,000 CI/CD minutes per month; Team from $4 per user per month with 3,000 minutes; Enterprise $21 per user per month with 50,000 minutes | 9.3 |
| 2 | GitLab CI/CD | Teams that want source control, pipelines and security testing in one platform, including on their own servers. | Free plan with 400 compute minutes per month for up to 5 users; Premium $29 per user per month billed annually with 10,000 minutes; Ultimate by quote | 8.8 |
| 3 | CircleCI | Teams that want a dedicated, fast cloud CI service that works with GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket. | Free plan with up to 6,000 build minutes and 5 active users; Performance starts at $15 per month with 30,000 credits; Scale by quote, billed annually | 8.7 |
| 4 |  Azure Pipelines | Microsoft and .NET teams that deploy to Azure or need hosted Windows and macOS agents. | 1 free Microsoft-hosted parallel job with 1,800 minutes per month and 1 free self-hosted job; extra jobs from $15 (self-hosted) or $40 (Microsoft-hosted) per month | 8.5 |
| 5 |  Buildkite | Large engineering teams and monorepos that want to run builds on their own infrastructure at high concurrency. | Free plan for up to 5 users; Pro $30 per active user per month with 10 agents included; Enterprise by quote; 30-day all-access trial | 8.4 |
| 6 |  Bitbucket Pipelines | Small and mid-size teams on Bitbucket and Jira that want the cheapest per-seat CI/CD. | Free for up to 5 users with 50 build minutes; Standard $3.65 per user per month; Premium $8 per user per month; extra 1,000 minutes for $10 per month | 8.3 |
| 7 |  Jenkins | Teams with ops capacity that want a free, fully self-hosted CI/CD server they can extend without limits. | Free and open source; you pay only for the servers it runs on | 8.1 |
| 8 |  TeamCity | Teams that want a self-hosted CI server with a polished interface and a free tier for small setups. | See vendor pricing (USD check pending) | 8.0 |
| 9 |  Harness | Larger organizations that want CI, continuous delivery and governance from one vendor. | Free plan for individual developers and small teams; Essentials bundle and modular Enterprise plan by quote | 7.9 |
| 10 |  Travis CI | Small teams that want simple hosted CI with a predictable monthly credit allowance. | Usage Based from $15 per month with 35,000 Linux build credits; Unlimited from $78 per month; Server from $34 per month; annual billing lowers Usage Based to $13.75 per month | 7.6 |
Scoring weights
Every tool gets three editorial scores out of 10, from vendor documentation, product pages and the published price. The overall score is the weighted average below, the same method on every list. Full method
The full ranking
Rank 1 · Best overall
GitHub Actions
CI/CD and workflow automation built into GitHub, triggered by any repository event.
github.com9.3
out of 10
Best for: Teams that host code on GitHub and want builds, tests and deploys next to their pull requests.
GitHub Actions is the easiest way for a GitHub team to automate builds, tests and deploys, because workflows sit in the repository and results appear on the pull request. Workflows can start on any GitHub event, not only pushes, so the same tool handles CI, releases and repository chores. GitHub documents support for Node.js, Python, Java, Ruby, PHP, Go, Rust and .NET, plus live logs you can link to by line, a built-in secret store and multi-container testing through docker-compose.
Pricing is generous at the low end. Free organizations get 2,000 CI/CD minutes a month, Team adds 3,000 minutes for $4 per user per month along with environment deployment branches and secrets, and Enterprise at $21 per user per month includes 50,000 minutes and environment protection rules. Public repositories build for free. The limits are lock-in to GitHub hosting and minute budgets that large monorepos can burn through, which is where self-hosted runners come in.
Standout feature
Workflows can start on any GitHub event, so CI, releases and repository automation share one tool.
Use cases
Startup engineering teams
Run tests and a preview deploy on every pull request
Outcome: Reviewers see passing checks before they merge
Open source maintainers
Build and test a public library across several runtime versions
Outcome: Broad test coverage at no cost
Platform teams
Gate production deploys on environment rules and secrets
Outcome: Controlled releases from the same tool that runs CI
Key features
- Workflows that run on any GitHub event, from pushes to new issues
- GitHub-hosted runners or your own self-hosted runners
- Built-in secret store at repository, environment and organization level
- Multi-container testing with docker-compose inside a workflow
- Actions marketplace of reusable steps
Pros
- CI/CD minutes included on every plan, from 2,000 a month on Free
- Free CI/CD for public repositories
- No separate tool to connect for teams already on GitHub
Cons
- Only works with repositories hosted on GitHub
- Environment protection rules need the Enterprise plan
- Heavy pipelines can use up included minutes quickly
Rank 2 · Runner-up
GitLab CI/CD
CI/CD built into the GitLab DevSecOps platform, available as SaaS, self-managed or dedicated.
gitlab.com8.8
out of 10
Best for: Teams that want source control, pipelines and security testing in one platform, including on their own servers.
GitLab CI/CD is the most complete option for teams that want one platform instead of a code host plus a CI service. Pipelines, source control, project management and security testing share one data model, and GitLab is available as cloud-hosted GitLab.com, as a self-managed instance where you keep full control of data and infrastructure, or as single-tenant Dedicated.
The Free plan includes source code management and CI/CD, static application security testing, 10 GiB of storage and 400 compute minutes a month for up to 5 users per top-level group. Premium at $29 per user per month, billed annually, adds advanced CI/CD, unlimited licensed users and 10,000 compute minutes. Ultimate adds 50,000 minutes, application security testing, supply chain security and vulnerability management at a custom price. The tradeoff is cost and breadth: GitLab costs more per seat than GitHub Team, and the interface exposes a lot of the wider platform, so teams that only need CI may find it heavier than they want.
Standout feature
The same platform can run on GitLab.com, on your own servers or as single-tenant Dedicated.
Use cases
Regulated companies
Run self-managed GitLab with runners inside their own network
Outcome: CI/CD that keeps code and build data on their infrastructure
DevSecOps teams
Add security testing stages to every merge request pipeline
Outcome: Findings surface before code reaches the main branch
Growing product teams
Move planning, code and CI into one Premium workspace
Outcome: Fewer tools to connect and pay for
Key features
- Source code management and CI/CD on the Free plan
- Advanced CI/CD on Premium
- Static application security testing included on Free
- GitLab.com, self-managed and single-tenant Dedicated options
- Application security testing and supply chain security on Ultimate
Pros
- One platform for code, pipelines, planning and security
- Can be self-managed with your own runners and storage
- 10,000 compute minutes a month on Premium
Cons
- Free plan is limited to 5 users per top-level group and 400 minutes
- Premium is billed annually at $29 per user
- Ultimate pricing only from sales
Rank 3 · Also great
CircleCI
Usage-based cloud CI/CD with Docker, Linux, Windows, Arm, macOS and self-hosted runners.
circleci.com8.7
out of 10
Best for: Teams that want a dedicated, fast cloud CI service that works with GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket.
CircleCI is the strongest dedicated cloud CI service here for teams that want speed and flexible machines without running their own fleet. It connects to GitHub, GitLab and Bitbucket, and every plan, including Free, offers Docker, Windows, Linux, Arm, macOS and self-hosted runners. Orbs package common configuration so teams do not rewrite the same deploy steps, and Smarter Testing, now generally available, runs fewer tests per change to return feedback sooner.
Billing runs on credits. The Free plan includes 30,000 credits a month, which CircleCI equates to up to 6,000 build minutes on a small Docker resource class, plus 5 active users and 30x concurrency. Performance starts at $15 per month, includes 30,000 credits and 5 active users, charges $15 a month per extra user and raises concurrency to 80x. Scale adds enterprise controls, GPU environments and the largest resource classes on annual contracts. The catch is predictability: estimating credits for mixed machine sizes takes some work before you can compare it with per-seat tools.
Standout feature
The Free plan includes macOS, Windows, Arm and self-hosted runners alongside up to 6,000 build minutes.
Use cases
Mobile teams
Build and test iOS apps on hosted macOS machines
Outcome: No Mac build servers to maintain
Teams on GitLab or Bitbucket
Add a dedicated CI service without moving repositories
Outcome: Faster pipelines while keeping the current code host
Teams with large test suites
Turn on Smarter Testing for pull request builds
Outcome: Shorter waits for test feedback
Key features
- Docker, Windows, Linux, Arm, macOS and self-hosted runners on Free
- Credit-based billing for users, machine sizes and premium features
- Orbs registry of reusable configuration packages
- Smarter Testing to run fewer tests and get faster feedback
- Integrations with GitHub, GitLab and Bitbucket
Pros
- Free plan includes up to 6,000 build minutes and 30x concurrency
- Performance plan starts at $15 per month with no seat minimum
- Wide choice of execution environments, including macOS
Cons
- Credit math takes time to estimate
- Additional users cost $15 per month each on Performance
- GPU and largest resource classes need the Scale plan
Rank 4
Azure Pipelines
Microsoft's CI/CD service for Linux, macOS and Windows, part of Azure DevOps.
azure.microsoft.com8.5
out of 10
Best for: Microsoft and .NET teams that deploy to Azure or need hosted Windows and macOS agents.
Azure Pipelines is the natural choice for teams in the Microsoft ecosystem, and it is not limited to Azure. Microsoft documents builds for Node.js, Python, Java, PHP, Ruby, C/C++.NET, Android and iOS on hosted Linux, macOS and Windows agents, container jobs, and deployments to Kubernetes, VMs, Azure Functions, Azure Web Apps or other clouds. Stages, gates and approvals give release managers control over production pushes, and Azure Pipelines can build repositories hosted on GitHub.
The pricing model is unusual and often cheap. You get one Microsoft-hosted parallel job with 1,800 minutes a month and one self-hosted job with unlimited minutes for free. After that you pay per parallel job with unlimited minutes: $40 a month for each Microsoft-hosted job and $15 for each self-hosted one. That makes long builds affordable, because minutes are not metered on paid jobs. The downside is that Azure DevOps has its own interface and user licensing, with the first 5 Basic users free and $6 per user after that.
Standout feature
Paid parallel jobs include unlimited minutes, so long builds do not raise the bill.
Use cases
.NET teams
Build Windows desktop apps on Microsoft-hosted agents
Outcome: No Windows build servers to patch
Teams with long builds
Buy self-hosted parallel jobs at $15 a month each
Outcome: Unlimited build minutes at a fixed monthly cost
Release managers
Add approval gates before the production stage
Outcome: A recorded sign-off on every release
Key features
- Microsoft-hosted Linux, macOS and Windows agents
- Container jobs and pushes to registries such as Docker Hub and Azure Container Registry
- Deploys to Kubernetes, VMs, Azure Functions, Azure Web Apps or any cloud
- Stages, gates and approvals for release strategies
- Builds for repositories hosted on GitHub
Pros
- Free hosted job with 1,800 minutes plus a free self-hosted job with unlimited minutes
- Priced by parallel job, not by build minute, once you pay
- Hosted Windows and macOS agents for desktop and mobile builds
Cons
- Azure DevOps interface feels separate from GitHub workflows
- Microsoft-hosted parallel jobs cost $40 each per month
- Users beyond the first 5 need a $6 per month Basic license for Azure DevOps
Rank 5
Buildkite
CI/CD platform built around self-hosted agents, with hosted agents, a Test Engine and package registries.
buildkite.com8.4
out of 10
Best for: Large engineering teams and monorepos that want to run builds on their own infrastructure at high concurrency.
Buildkite is built for teams whose CI has outgrown simple hosted runners. Its core idea is that the control plane is hosted while builds run on agents you control, so you can use your own cloud account, hardware or private network and scale to high concurrency. Dynamic pipelines let a build generate its next steps at runtime from code changes or test results, which suits monorepos and Bazel setups. Buildkite also offers hosted Linux, Windows and Mac agents, a Test Engine for flaky tests and test splitting, and package registries.
The Free plan covers up to 5 users, 10 concurrent jobs, 2,000 Linux vCPU minutes and 250k test executions a month. Pro costs $30 per active user per month for up to 50 users, with 10 agents included and more at $3.50 each, 4,000 vCPU minutes and access to larger machines. Enterprise adds SSO, audit exports and a 99.95% uptime commitment. The price per user is high, and smaller teams may not need this level of control.
Standout feature
Dynamic pipelines let each build write its own next steps at runtime.
Use cases
Monorepo teams
Generate pipeline steps dynamically based on changed packages
Outcome: Builds that only run what a change affects
Teams leaving Jenkins
Move build jobs to Buildkite agents on existing machines
Outcome: A hosted dashboard without giving up their own compute
QA leads
Track flaky tests in Test Engine
Outcome: Fewer red builds caused by unreliable tests
Key features
- Dynamic pipelines that generate steps at runtime
- Self-hosted agents plus Linux, Windows and Mac hosted agents
- Test Engine for flaky test detection and test splitting
- Package registries to speed up builds
- Enterprise SCIM, SAML, audit log exports and 99.95% uptime commitment
Pros
- Scales to high concurrency on your own compute
- Dynamic pipelines on every plan, including Free
- 30-day all-access trial with no credit card
Cons
- Pro costs $30 per active user, more than most per-seat tools here
- Agents beyond the 10 included on Pro cost $3.50 each per month
- You manage your own agent infrastructure unless you pay for hosted agents
Rank 6
Bitbucket Pipelines
CI/CD built into Atlassian's Bitbucket Cloud, with Jira integration.
bitbucket.org8.3
out of 10
Best for: Small and mid-size teams on Bitbucket and Jira that want the cheapest per-seat CI/CD.
Bitbucket Pipelines is the simplest way for Atlassian teams to add CI/CD, because pipelines live in the Bitbucket repository and builds link to Jira issues. It runs on Atlassian cloud runners, and larger runner sizes count build minutes at a multiple, so a 5-minute step on a 2x runner uses 10 minutes. Build minutes and storage are shared across all users in a workspace.
Pricing is the lowest per seat here. The Free plan covers up to 5 users with unlimited public and private repositories, 1 GB of LFS storage and 50 build minutes to get started. Standard costs $3.65 per user per month and Premium $8 per user per month, both with free trials, and extra capacity costs $10 a month for 1,000 build minutes or 100 GB of storage. Community and academic subscriptions get 500 build minutes. The limits are a small free allowance, a tie to Bitbucket Cloud and fewer machine types than CircleCI or Buildkite, so it fits standard web and service builds better than complex fleets.
Standout feature
Standard costs $3.65 per user per month, the lowest seat price on this list.
Use cases
Agencies on Jira
Run tests on every pull request and link results to Jira issues
Outcome: Project managers see build status next to tickets
Small product teams
Move from manual deploys to a pipeline on Standard
Outcome: Automated releases for a few dollars per developer
Teams with occasional heavy builds
Buy blocks of 1,000 extra minutes when needed
Outcome: Predictable overage costs
Key features
- Pipelines defined in the repository and run on Atlassian cloud runners
- Jira integration for linking builds to issues
- Packages and Git LFS storage
- Larger runner sizes that consume build minutes at a multiple
- Premium plan with AI and automation features
Pros
- Lowest per-seat price on this list at $3.65 per user
- Unlimited public and private repositories on Free
- Extra build minutes are cheap at $10 per 1,000
Cons
- Free plan includes only 50 build minutes
- Only for repositories on Bitbucket Cloud
- Fewer execution environments than dedicated CI services
8.1
out of 10
Best for: Teams with ops capacity that want a free, fully self-hosted CI/CD server they can extend without limits.
Jenkins is the long-standing open source automation server, and it is still the most extensible option on this list. The project lists 2,300+ community contributed plugins, which means it integrates with practically every tool in a build and delivery toolchain. It is a self-contained Java program with packages for Windows, Linux, macOS and other Unix-like systems, it is configured through a web interface with built-in help, and it can distribute work across many machines to run builds, tests and deploys in parallel.
The value is clear: there are no license fees, and it runs anywhere, from a single server to large private fleets in networks with no internet access. The cost moves to your team instead. Someone has to host, upgrade and secure the controller, keep plugins compatible and maintain agents, and there is no vendor support contract from the project itself. For teams without that capacity, a hosted service usually costs less in practice.
Standout feature
More than 2,300 community plugins connect Jenkins to almost any build or deploy tool.
Use cases
Enterprises with private networks
Run Jenkins and its agents fully inside an isolated network
Outcome: CI/CD with no external service dependency
Platform teams
Connect legacy build tools through existing plugins
Outcome: Automation for systems newer CI services do not cover
Budget-limited teams
Run Jenkins on spare servers
Outcome: CI/CD with no license cost
Key features
- 2,300+ community contributed plugins
- Self-contained Java program with packages for Windows, Linux and macOS
- Web-based setup with on-the-fly error checks
- Distributed builds across multiple machines
- Works as a simple CI server or a full delivery hub
Pros
- No license fees
- Plugin coverage for practically every tool in the toolchain
- Runs anywhere, including air-gapped networks
Cons
- You host, patch and back up the server yourself
- Plugin compatibility needs ongoing care
- No vendor support contract from the project itself
8.0
out of 10
Best for: Teams that want a self-hosted CI server with a polished interface and a free tier for small setups.
TeamCity is JetBrains' CI/CD server, offered both on-premises and as TeamCity Cloud. On-premises, the Professional edition is free, needs no license key and includes 3 build agents with the full Enterprise feature set, except that it caps you at 100 build configurations and 10 pipelines, limits support to the community forum and leaves out some AI features. Enterprise requires a license, adds private support and lets you buy more agent slots, and Enterprise Plus adds true-up licensing for busy periods. Each extra agent also raises the Professional limit by 10 build configurations.
TeamCity Cloud is billed by committer slots. Each slot comes with storage, data transfer and build credits that are spent on JetBrains-hosted agents or exchanged for self-hosted agents and extra concurrency. Build steps can run inside Docker containers. We could not confirm USD prices from the pricing page, which loads with JavaScript, so check current figures with JetBrains. The licensing model rewards planning but is harder to estimate than a flat seat price.
Standout feature
The free Professional edition includes 3 build agents with most Enterprise features.
Use cases
Small on-premises teams
Run TeamCity Professional with 3 build agents
Outcome: A full-featured CI server with no license cost
Game and desktop studios
Add Enterprise agent slots for parallel builds
Outcome: More builds at once on their own hardware
Teams avoiding server upkeep
Move to TeamCity Cloud with JetBrains-hosted agents
Outcome: The same tool without hosting the server
Key features
- Free Professional edition with 3 build agents and no license key
- Enterprise edition with purchasable agent slots
- Enterprise Plus true-up licensing to exceed agent limits
- TeamCity Cloud with JetBrains-hosted and self-hosted agents
- Docker-based build steps
Pros
- Professional tier is free for up to 100 build configurations
- Same distribution switches to Enterprise with a license key
- Cloud option for teams that do not want to host a server
Cons
- Professional allows only 10 pipelines and community support
- Pricing page needs JavaScript and was not verified in USD
- Agent and committer licensing takes planning
Rank 9
Harness
Software delivery platform with CI, CD, GitOps, infrastructure as code and security testing modules.
harness.io7.9
out of 10
Best for: Larger organizations that want CI, continuous delivery and governance from one vendor.
Harness is the broadest delivery platform on this list. Beyond builds, it sells modules for continuous delivery and GitOps, infrastructure as code, database DevOps, artifact registry, feature management, security testing and more. The Free plan, aimed at individual developers and small teams, includes Harness Open Source, Litmus Chaos and community support.
Paid plans are quoted by sales. Essentials is an all-in-one bundle of CI, CD, code repository, security testing orchestration and infrastructure as code management for up to 500 users, with up to 60 concurrent pipeline executions, 6 months of execution history and no on-premises option. Enterprise lets you pick modules and raises limits, for example to 500 concurrent delivery executions and unlimited users, with premier support and a dedicated account manager. Harness integrates with GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Jenkins and Kubernetes and deploys to AWS, Azure, Google Cloud and on-premises targets. Its strength is governance across many teams, and its weakness for smaller buyers is the lack of published prices.
Standout feature
One vendor covers CI, continuous delivery, GitOps, infrastructure as code and security testing.
Use cases
Enterprise platform teams
Standardize deployment templates and policy as code across business units
Outcome: Consistent release rules for every team
Teams on Jenkins
Keep Jenkins builds and add Harness for deployments
Outcome: Controlled delivery without rewriting CI
Multi-cloud companies
Deploy one service to AWS, Azure and Google Cloud from one pipeline
Outcome: One delivery process across clouds
Key features
- Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery and GitOps modules
- Infrastructure as code management and database DevOps
- Security testing orchestration in the Essentials bundle
- Policy as code, templates and pipeline chaining
- Deployments across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, on-premises and private cloud
Pros
- Covers delivery, governance and security, not only builds
- Integrates with GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Jenkins and Kubernetes
- Free plan includes Harness Open Source
Cons
- No published prices for Essentials or Enterprise
- Essentials has no on-premises option
- More platform than small teams need
Rank 10
Travis CI
Hosted CI/CD with usage-based and unlimited plans, plus an on-premises Server edition.
travis-ci.com7.6
out of 10
Best for: Small teams that want simple hosted CI with a predictable monthly credit allowance.
Travis CI is a hosted CI service with simple, published plans. The Usage Based plan costs $15 per month, or $13.75 per month billed yearly with 420,000 credits a year, and includes 35,000 Linux build credits a month, up to 80 concurrent jobs and access to premium VMs. The Unlimited plan starts at $78 per month and removes credit limits for builds on non-premium VMs, collaborators and repositories, with 1 to 300 concurrent jobs. Teams of 20 or more can ask for volume discounts.
Builds run on Linux, FreeBSD and Windows VMs, with larger and GPU sizes available, and IBM and ARM partner queues are limited to open source projects. A Server edition from $34 per month runs on-premises or in a private cloud and supports Perforce and Subversion, which is rare among hosted CI vendors. Support includes an AI assistant and tickets. Travis CI lacks a permanent free plan for private work and offers fewer platform features than GitHub Actions or CircleCI.
Standout feature
The Server edition supports Perforce and Subversion as well as Git.
Use cases
Small teams
Run Linux builds within the 35,000 monthly credits
Outcome: Hosted CI for a fixed $15 a month
Teams on Perforce or Subversion
Install Travis CI Server in a private cloud
Outcome: CI/CD without moving to Git
Busy repositories
Move to the Unlimited plan
Outcome: No credit tracking for standard VM builds
Key features
- Usage Based plan with 35,000 Linux build credits per month
- Unlimited plan with unlimited build credits, collaborators and repositories
- Linux, FreeBSD and Windows VMs, with premium larger VMs
- Server edition for on-premises or private cloud with Perforce and Subversion
- Ask Travis AI support
Pros
- Low entry price at $15 per month
- Unlimited plan removes credit counting
- Server edition supports Perforce and Subversion
Cons
- No permanent free plan for private projects
- Users are charged on the Usage Based plan
- Fewer platform features than the leaders on this list
Frequently asked questions
+What is the best CI/CD tool in 2026?
GitHub Actions is our top pick for teams on GitHub, because workflows live next to the code and every plan includes CI/CD minutes, 2,000 a month on Free and 3,000 on Team at $4 per user per month. GitLab CI/CD is the best alternative for teams that want code, pipelines and security testing in one platform.
+What is the best free CI/CD tool?
Jenkins is free and open source if you can host it. Among hosted options, CircleCI Free offers up to 6,000 build minutes, GitHub Free 2,000 CI/CD minutes, Buildkite Free 2,000 Linux vCPU minutes and Azure Pipelines one hosted job with 1,800 minutes a month.
+Should I use hosted runners or self-hosted agents?
Hosted runners are simpler and suit most teams. Self-hosted agents make sense when builds need private network access, special hardware or a lot of minutes, and tools such as Buildkite, Jenkins, TeamCity and Azure Pipelines are priced to make that cheaper.
+Which CI/CD tool is cheapest for a small team?
Bitbucket Pipelines Standard costs $3.65 per user per month and GitHub Team $4 per user per month, both with included minutes. CircleCI Performance and Travis CI Usage Based both start at $15 per month for the team rather than per seat.
+How did we rank these CI/CD tools?
We compared documented features and published prices from each vendor's own pages and scored features, ease of use and value. The overall score weighs features at 40%, ease of use at 30% and value at 30%.
About this list
Updated November 9, 2026 by the Mojolin research desk. Mojolin is self-funded
Questions or corrections: editorial@mojolin.com
More best software lists